比較：HAR サニタイザー vs ログスクラバー
判断フレーム：Choose the right redaction workflow for browser network captures, application logs, headers, cookies, and incident snippets.
利用場面：Use this comparison before sharing evidence in an issue, ticket, vendor portal, or chat thread.
判断材料
| 項目 | Byteflow | もう一つの選択肢 | 実務上の注意 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input shape（判断項目） | Byteflow のローカル手順：HAR サニタイザー parses browser capture structure and redacts sensitive network fields defensively. | 別の選択肢：ログスクラバー scans text for common secrets, PII patterns, tokens, and identifiers. | 実務メモ：Use the parser that understands your evidence format. |
| Redaction scope（判断項目） | Byteflow のローカル手順：HAR workflows can target headers, cookies, query strings, request bodies, and response bodies. | 別の選択肢：Log workflows can target bearer tokens, keys, emails, IPs, paths, and repeated secret-like strings. | 実務メモ：Structured captures and free text fail in different ways. |
| Review step（判断項目） | Byteflow のローカル手順：Export only after comparing sanitized output and confirming that URLs and bodies are safe to share. | 別の選択肢：Diff scrubbed logs against the original so expected context remains while secrets are removed. | 実務メモ：Automated redaction is a first pass, not a legal or security approval. |
実務判断：Use HAR サニタイザー for browser evidence
実務判断：Choose the HAR workflow when the source is a browser export or network troubleshooting capture with request and response metadata.
実務判断：Use ログスクラバー for text evidence
実務判断：Choose the log workflow when the source is application output, shell logs, stack traces, CI logs, or pasted incident notes.
このワークフローのツール
目的別のツールを直接開けます。これらのリンクは検索や sitemap 生成と同じ registry データを使います。
信頼性チェック
プライバシー境界：HAR files and logs commonly contain credentials, cookies, account IDs, full URLs, and private request or response bodies. Keep sanitization local and review before export.
プライバシーと信頼センターよくある質問
質問：Can I sanitize a HAR file with a plain text scrubber?
回答：You can catch some patterns, but a HAR-aware sanitizer is safer because it understands headers, cookies, URLs, and body fields.
質問：Is sanitized output automatically safe to post publicly?
回答：No. Review the result, check domain-specific identifiers, and share the smallest useful excerpt.